Peer Review Process
IJRDO Journal of Tourism and Hospitality has a well-defined review process to maintain the quality and integrity of research. Submissions are carefully checked before they are published.
Initial Screening
When each article is submitted, it is first screened by the journal's editors. This ensures that:
This may result in manuscript rejection or return to the author for revision.
Peer Review
Manuscripts that make it through the initial review are peer-reviewed by specialists in the subject. They will look at:
Reviewers may make suggestions for improving the manuscript.
Outcome & Revision
Review Outcome — The editor will decide, based on the reviewers' comments:
Reviewers' comments and the decision are sent to the authors.
Revision Process
If the decision is to revise, authors are given the opportunity to revise and resubmit. The manuscript will then be re-reviewed if necessary. Authors are asked to respond to all comments.
Final Decision
When the manuscript has been revised to meet acceptable standards, it is accepted for publication. The decision is taken by the editorial team.
Confidentiality
Manuscripts and reviewer identities are kept confidential. Review procedures are managed to ensure that the work and the identities of the participants remain confidential.
Commitment
The journal strives to ensure an equitable, transparent, and timely review process. The aim is to help authors improve their manuscripts and to publish valid and valuable material.